Won the Nagoya Battle at # MA8 (Mash Up Award) in 2012 Nanihanas In order to complete the app (for the first time in a year and a half)
I opened a project after a long time, completed the app, and applied to the Apple Store.
At that time, I had no idea that I would fight the Apple Store for so long. . .
・ First application (around April 30)
The first rejection was around 5/6, what is the purpose of the app? was.
Countermeasure → Add side menu and explanation page
・ The second application (around May 8)
The next rejection was about 5/9, and it was rejected because it could not be registered with a simple app.
Countermeasure → History display screen added
・ The third application (around May 10)
Furthermore, it was rejected around May 19, and was rejected because it could not be registered due to lack of interactivity.
By the way, the reason is below.
Reasons
2.12: Apps that are not very useful, are simply web sites bundled as apps, or do not provide any lasting entertainment value may be rejected Thank you for resubmitting your app.
2.12
We still found that your app only provides a very limited set of features.It contains text-based, informative contents only.It would be appropriate to add more interactive features for users.
Please resolve this issue and resubmit your app.We look forward to reviewing your revised version.
Countermeasure → Add Twitter search and WIKI search
・ The fourth application (around May 20)
I was rejected again around May 21st and I have inputs, but can't manage the output part? Rejected for a reason.
Countermeasure → Add tweet function to Twitter
・ The fifth application (around May 23)
The 5th rejection was about 5/29 and was rejected because of a problem.
Countermeasures → Bug fixes
・ The 6th application (around 6/6)
Your application has been successfully filed and has been posted to the Apple Store.
Such an app Here is.
This time, to some extent, what I felt was a two-way mechanism, I thought that applications would not be able to pass unless it was an application with sufficient functions, and I thought that it would pass someday if I corresponded to the steady road.
However, it was painful that the meaning of interactive was too broad and I couldn't understand it. . .